Prevalence, microbiology, and outcome of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients in vietnam: a multicenter study

Nguyen Bach, Trinh Thi Kim Chi, Lu Cong Trung, Nguyen Hoang Bao Ngoc, Thai Pham Thi Hoa, Thao Ngoc Phuong Huynh, Truong Hoang Khai, Dang Anh Dao, Phan Xuan Tuoc, Vuong Quoc Dung
Đã xuất bản: 11 March 2025

Tạp chí: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

ISSN: 1471-2369

Tập: 26

Số xuất bản: 1
Loại nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu Quốc tế

Tóm Tắt

Background
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a substantial contributor to global mortality, requiring interventions like kidney transplantation and dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as an effective dialytic modality despite the susceptibility to peritonitis. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of peritonitis among PD patients, elucidating pivotal factors affecting its occurrence, causative bacterial agents, and treatment outcomes (mortality rates, removal of the Tenckhoff catheter, and switch to hemodialysis).

Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted, which included patients who underwent PD between January 2019 and December 2021 at nine dialysis centers in Vietnam. The prevalence rate of peritonitis was estimated as the quotient of total peritonitis episodes and cumulative patient-years. The association of peritonitis with factors such as age, care (self-care or helper-assisted PD), comorbidities, education level was analyzed using regression analysis. Peritonitis outcomes including mortality rate, Tenckhoff catheter removal, and transitions to hemodialysis were evaluated. PD-related infections were assessed. Additionally, the causative bacterial agents and the negative culture rate were determined.

Results
A total of 691 PD patients from nine centers from the south of Vietnam were recruited for the study. Peritonitis was reported in 32.42% of the patients during the study period of 2019–2021. An increase in the number of patients reporting peritonitis was observed over the years. A significant association (p = 0.01) between peritonitis rate and level of literacy was found. The mortality rate among patients who underwent PD was 2.68%. About 16.18% of patients with peritonitis had to have the Tenckhoff catheter removed and needed to be switched to hemodialysis. Around 46.98% of the peritonitis cases were culture-positive.

Conclusion
The prevalence of peritonitis among PD patients in Vietnam increased from 2019 to 2021. Lower literacy positively correlated with peritonitis, regardless of the type of PD. The high prevalence of culture-negative peritonitis cases indicated gaps in diagnostic procedures or the presence of unusual pathogens. These outcomes highlight the need for improved education, diagnostic practices, and interventions to reduce peritonitis risks and enhance patient care in PD programs in Vietnam.

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Vaidya SR, Aeddula NR. In: StatPearls, editor. Chronic kidney disease. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  2. Kovesdy CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl. 2022;12:7–11.
  3. Hashmi MF, Benjamin O, Lappin SL. In: StatPearls, editor. End-Stage renal disease. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  4. Pham Van B, Vo Duc C. Global Dialysis Perspective: Vietnam Kidney360. 2020;1:974–6.
  5. Andreoli MCC, Totoli C. Peritoneal Dialysis. Rev Assoc Médica Bras. 2020;66(suppl 1):s37–44.
  6. Bách N, Cong LC. Evaluation of the results of implementing the program promoting the choice of home periodilitation at Thong Nhat hospital. Vietnam Med J. 2023;527:203–6.
  7. Dos Santos ACML, Hernandes RT, Montelli AC, Monteiro ACM, Barbosa TA, Camargo CH, et al. Clinical and Microbiological factors predicting outcomes of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12248.
  8. Szeto C-C, Li PK-T. Peritoneal Dialysis–Associated peritonitis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:1100–5.
  9. Tian Y, Xie X, Xiang S, Yang X, Zhang X, Shou Z, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of high peritonitis rate in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: A retrospective study. Med (Baltim). 2016;95:e5569.
  10. Dong X, Wu H, Ye H, Yi C, Diao X, Liu R, et al. Incidence and risk factors associated with technique failure in the first year of peritoneal dialysis: A single center retrospective cohort study in Southern China. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23:207.
  11. Salzer WL. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: challenges and solutions. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. 2018;11:173–86.
  12. Nguyen B, Bui QTH, Tran PQ. Survival rates in elderly patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal Dialysis. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. 2023;16:131–41.
  13. Li PK-T, Chow KM, Cho Y, Fan S, Figueiredo AE, Harris T, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42:110–53.
  14. Kwong VW-K, Li PK-T. Peritoneal Dialysis in Asia. Kidney Dis. 2015;1:147–56.
  15. Ong LM, Ch’ng CC, Wee HC, Supramaniam P, Zainal H, Goh BL, et al. Risk of peritoneal Dialysis-Related peritonitis in a Multi-Racial Asian population. Perit Dial Int J Int Soc Perit Dial. 2017;37:35–43.
  16. Perl J, Fuller DS, Bieber BA, Boudville N, Kanjanabuch T, Ito Y, et al. Peritoneal Dialysis–Related infection rates and outcomes: results from the peritoneal Dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (PDOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76:42–53.
  17. Nguyen GT, Truong DH. Risks of surface water pollution in Southern Vietnam. Civ Eng J. 2023;9:2725–35.
  18. Nguyen DB, Arduino MJ, Patel PR. Hemodialysis-Associated infections. Chronic kidney disease, dialysis, and transplantation. Elsevier; 2019. p. 389–410.
  19. Wu HHL, Dhaygude AP, Mitra S, Tennankore KK. Home dialysis in older adults: challenges and solutions. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16:422–31.
  20. Chen H-C, Shieh C-C, Sung J-M. Increasing Staphylococcus species resistance in peritoneal Dialysis-Related peritonitis over a 10-Year period in a single Taiwanese center. Perit Dial Int. 2018;38:266–70.
  21. Hu S, Tong R, Bo Y, Ming P, Yang H. Fungal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: 5-year review from a North China center. Infection. 2019;47:35–43.
  22. Song P, Yang D, Li J, Zhuo N, Fu X, Zhang L, et al. Microbiology and outcome of peritoneal Dialysis-Related peritonitis in elderly patients: A retrospective study in China. Front Med. 2022;9:799110.
  23. Tanratananon D, Deekae S, Raksasuk S, Srithongkul T. Evaluation of different methods to improve culture-negative peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: A single-center study. Ann Med Surg. 2021;63:102139.
  24. Hu Y, Xu L, Wang X, Qin X, Wan S, Luo Q, et al. Changes before and after COVID-19 pandemic on the personal hygiene behaviors and incidence of peritonitis in peritoneal-dialysis patients: a multi-center retrospective study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54:411–9.
  25. Gursu M, Shehaj L, Elcioglu OC, Kazancioglu R. The optimization of peritoneal dialysis training in long-term. Front Nephrol. 2023;3:1108030
  26. Chow KM, Szeto CC, Leung CB, Law MC, Li PK-T. Impact of social factors on patients on peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2005;20:2504–10.
  27. Tang W, Grace B, McDonald SP, Hawley CM, Badve SV, Boudville NC, et al. Socio-Economic status and peritonitis in Australian Non-Indigenous peritoneal Dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2015;35:450–9.
  28. Kim HJ, Lee J, Park M, Kim Y, Lee H, Kim DK, et al. Lower education level is a risk factor for peritonitis and technique failure but not a risk for overall mortality in peritoneal Dialysis under comprehensive training system. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169063.
  29. Reis M, Ribeiro C, Gomes AM, Santos C, Lopes D, Fernandes JC. Repeat and relapsing peritonitis Microbiological trends and outcomes: A 21-Year Single-Center experience. Int J Nephrol. 2021;2021:6662488.
  30. Nochaiwong S, Ruengorn C, Koyratkoson K, Thavorn K, Awiphan R, Chaisai C, et al. A clinical risk prediction tool for Peritonitis-Associated treatment failure in peritoneal Dialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14797.
  31. Kwan JR, Chong TT, Low GZ, Low GW, Htay H, Foo MW, et al. Outcomes following peritoneal dialysis catheter removal with reinsertion or permanent transfer to haemodialysis. J Vasc Access. 2019;20:60–4.
  32. Marshall MR. A systematic review of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis rates over time from National or regional population-based registries and databases. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42:39–47.
  33. De Moraes TP, Olandoski M, Caramori JCT, Martin LC, Fernandes N, Divino-Filho JC, et al. Novel predictors of Peritonitis-Related outcomes in the BRAZPD cohort. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34:179–87.
  34. Ye H, Zhou Q, Fan L, Guo Q, Mao H, Huang F, et al. The impact of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:186.
Đã xuất bản: 11 March 2025
Tạp chí: BMC Nephrology
Nhà xuất bản: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
ISSN: 1471-2369
Tập: 26
Số xuất bản: 1
Loại nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu Quốc tế

Trích dẫn bài viết này

Nguyen Bach, Trinh Thi Kim Chi, Lu Cong Trung, Nguyen Hoang Bao Ngoc, Thai Pham Thi Hoa, Thao Ngoc Phuong Huynh, Truong Hoang Khai, Dang Anh Dao, Phan Xuan Tuoc, Vuong Quoc Dung. Prevalence, microbiology, and outcome of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients in vietnam: a multicenter study. BMC Nephrology. 2025. 26 (1). doi:10.1186/s12882-025-04061-y