Đăng ký
Đăng nhập
Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
Trung tâm đào tạo - Chỉ đạo tuyến
Nghiên cứu khoa học - Hợp tác quốc tế

Fabrication of in situ crosslinking hydrogels based on oxidized alginate/N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/β-tricalcium phosphate for bone regeneration

Binh Thanh Vu, Van My Hua, Tuan-Ngan Tang, Nhi Ngoc-Thao Dang, Hang Thi-Thuy Cao, Thang Bach Phan, Hanh Thi-Kieu Ta, Viet Hung Pham, Quyen Ngoc Tran, Thanh Dinh Le, Toi Van Vo, Hiep Thi Nguyen
Tải PDF
Đã xuất bản: 1 Tháng 9 2022

Tạp chí: Elsevier BV

ISSN: 2468-2179

Tập: 7

Số xuất bản: 4
Loại nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu Quốc tế
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsamd.2022.100503

Tóm Tắt

In this study, hydrogels based on in situ crosslinking between oxidized alginate (OA) and N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan (NOCC) in combination with β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) were prepared using different OA concentrations and OA to NOCC ratios. Various hydrogel characterizations were examined and revealed the strong effect of OA concentrations and NOCC contents on the ability of hydrogel formation, swelling degree, degradability and compression strength. Besides, Schiff's base crosslinking between aldehyde groups of OA and amino groups of NOCC, indicating hydrogel formation, was confirmed via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra. The presence of β-TCP in hydrogels was also confirmed by FT-IR, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images. Furthermore, most hydrogels were non-cytotoxic and expressed the capability for cells to penetrate, migrate and exchange nutrients and oxygen. Besides, further experiments demonstrated their in vivo biocompatibility. Generally, the results suggested that hydrogels based on 3% (w/v) OA, 3% (w/v) NOCC (OA:NOCC volume ratio is 1:3) and 20% (w/w) β-TCP have the potential for bone regeneration.

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Susheem Kanwar et al., Design of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A review. Bioprinting. 2021; 24 :. doi: 10.1016/J.BPRINT.2021.E00167Google Scholar
  2. Tao Zhang et al., Bioink design for extrusion-based bioprinting. Applied Materials Today. 2021; :. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101227Google Scholar
  3. Zhan Jing et al., The role of natural polymers in bone tissue engineering.. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2021; :. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.055Google Scholar
  4. S. Kalsi et al., Biomaterials for tissue engineered bone Scaffolds: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; :. doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.04.273Google Scholar
  5. A. Salama et al., Recent progress in preparation and applications of chitosan/calcium phosphate composite materials.. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2021; :. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.143Google Scholar
  6. A. Prasad et al., State of art review on bioabsorbable polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; :. doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.11.622Google Scholar
  7. Min Jin et al., Polysaccharide-based Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering: A review.. Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews. 2020; :. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0208Google Scholar
  8. Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez et al., Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.. Tissue engineering. Part A. 2020; :. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0305Google Scholar
  9. Lei Ma et al., Synthesis and characterization of injectable self-healing hydrogels based on oxidized alginate-hybrid-hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and carboxymethyl chitosan.. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2020; :. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.004Google Scholar
  10. H. D. Tran et al., A comprehensive review on polymeric hydrogel and its composite: Matrices of choice for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2020; 89 :58-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.06.017Google Scholar
  11. Hai Van Ho et al., Novel TOCNF reinforced injectable alginate / β-tricalcium phosphate microspheres for bone regeneration. Materials & Design. 2020; 194 :108892. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108892Google Scholar
  12. A. Le et al., Modulating biodegradation and biocompatibility of in situ crosslinked hydrogel by the integration of alginate into N,O-carboxylmethyl chitosan – aldehyde hyaluronic acid network. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2020; 180 :109270. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109270Google Scholar
  13. Aurora C. Hernández-González et al., Alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering, from injectables to bioprinting: A review.. Carbohydrate polymers. 2020; 229 :115514. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115514Google Scholar
  14. N. Nguyen et al., The effect of oxidation degree and volume ratio of components on properties and applications of in situ cross-linking hydrogels based on chitosan and hyaluronic acid.. Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications. 2019; 103 :109670. doi: 10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.04.049Google Scholar
  15. Gopal Shankar Krishnakumar et al., Importance of crosslinking strategies in designing smart biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: A systematic review.. Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications. 2019; 96 :941-954. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.081Google Scholar
  16. Z. Emami et al., Controlling alginate oxidation conditions for making alginate-gelatin hydrogels.. Carbohydrate polymers. 2018; 198 :509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.080Google Scholar
  17. Lin Zhu et al., Properties of a novel carboxymethyl chitosan derived from silkworm pupa.. Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology. 2018; 99 2 :e21499. doi: 10.1002/arch.21499Google Scholar
  18. Supachai Reakasame et al., Oxidized Alginate-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review.. Biomacromolecules. 2018; 19 1 :3-21. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01331Google Scholar
  19. E. Axpe et al., Applications of Alginate-Based Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17 :. doi: 10.3390/ijms17121976Google Scholar
  20. R. LogithKumar et al., A review of chitosan and its derivatives in bone tissue engineering.. Carbohydrate polymers. 2016; 151 :172-188. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.049Google Scholar
  21. Xiujuan Zhao et al., Reactive electrospinning of composite nanofibers of carboxymethyl chitosan cross-linked by alginate dialdehyde with the aid of polyethylene oxide.. Carbohydrate polymers. 2016; 148 :98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.051Google Scholar
  22. Chhavi Sharma et al., Fabrication and characterization of novel nano-biocomposite scaffold of chitosan-gelatin-alginate-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering.. Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications. 2016; 64 :416-427. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.060Google Scholar
  23. Avik Sarker et al., HAp granules encapsulated oxidized alginate-gelatin-biphasic calcium phosphate hydrogel for bone regeneration.. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2015; 81 :898-911. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.09.029Google Scholar
  24. Yufeng Zhang et al., Determination of a critical size calvarial defect in senile osteoporotic mice model based on in vivo micro-computed tomography and histological evaluation.. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2015; 61 1 :44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.01.019Google Scholar
  25. V. Campana et al., Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2014; 25 :2445 - 2461. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2Google Scholar
  26. S. Samavedi et al., Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering: a review of properties and their influence on cell behavior.. Acta biomaterialia. 2013; 9 9 :8037-45. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.014Google Scholar
  27. Laxmi Upadhyaya et al., Biomedical applications of carboxymethyl chitosans.. Carbohydrate polymers. 2013; 91 1 :452-66. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.076Google Scholar
  28. Xingyi Li et al., A covalently crosslinked polysaccharide hydrogel for potential applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2012; 23 :2857-2865. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4757-5Google Scholar
  29. Yingyu Zhou et al., Radiation synthesis of gelatin/CM-chitosan/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2012; 32 :994-1000. doi: 10.1016/J.MSEC.2012.02.029Google Scholar
  30. L. Bērziņa-Cimdiņa et al., Research of Calcium Phosphates Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. . 2012; :. doi: 10.5772/36942Google Scholar
  31. S. Bose et al., Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review.. Acta biomaterialia. 2012; 8 4 :1401-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.017Google Scholar
  32. Adem Çinarli et al., Synthesis, spectral characterizations and antimicrobial activity of some Schiff bases of 4-chloro-2-aminophenol. Bulletin of The Chemical Society of Ethiopia. 2011; 25 :. doi: 10.4314/BCSE.V25I3.68593Google Scholar
  33. Jin Ye et al., Critical-size calvarial bone defects healing in a mouse model with silk scaffolds and SATB2-modified iPSCs.. Biomaterials. 2011; 32 22 :5065-76. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.053Google Scholar
  34. A. R. Costa-Pinto et al., Scaffolds based bone tissue engineering: the role of chitosan.. Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews. 2011; 17 5 :331-47. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0704Google Scholar
  35. P. Gomes et al., Rodent models in bone-related research: the relevance of calvarial defects in the assessment of bone regeneration strategies. Laboratory Animals. 2011; 45 :14 - 24. doi: 10.1258/la.2010.010085Google Scholar
  36. K. Cai et al., Physical and Biological Properties of a Novel Hydrogel Composite Based on Oxidized Alginate, Gelatin and Tricalcium Phosphate for Bone Tissue Engineering. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2007; 9 :. doi: 10.1002/adem.200700222Google Scholar
  37. Sung-Ching Chen et al., A novel pH-sensitive hydrogel composed of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan and alginate cross-linked by genipin for protein drug delivery.. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2004; 96 2 :285-300. doi: 10.1016/J.JCONREL.2004.02.002Google Scholar
Tải PDF
Đã xuất bản: 1 Tháng 9 2022
Tạp chí: Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
Nhà xuất bản: Elsevier BV
ISSN: 2468-2179
Tập: 7
Số xuất bản: 4
Loại nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu Quốc tế
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsamd.2022.100503

Trích dẫn bài viết này

Binh Thanh Vu, Van My Hua, Tuan-Ngan Tang, Nhi Ngoc-Thao Dang, Hang Thi-Thuy Cao, Thang Bach Phan, Hanh Thi-Kieu Ta, Viet Hung Pham, Quyen Ngoc Tran, Thanh Dinh Le, Toi Van Vo, Hiep Thi Nguyen. Fabrication of in situ crosslinking hydrogels based on oxidized alginate/N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/β-tricalcium phosphate for bone regeneration. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices. 2022. 7 (4). doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2022.100503
Logo Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
Trung tâm đào tạo - Chỉ đạo tuyến
Nghiên cứu khoa học - Hợp tác quốc tế
  • ĐC: Số 1, Lý Thường Kiệt, P. 7, Q. Tân Bình, TP. HCM
  • SĐT: (028) 38690277 - (028) 39713184
  • FAX: (028) 39713184
  • Email: [email protected]
Liên kết nhanh
Giới thiệu
Đào tạo
Tin tức
Chỉ đạo tuyến
Sự kiện
Nghiên cứu khoa học
Liên hệ
Hợp tác quốc tế
Liên kết bên ngoài
Facebook-f Linkedin-in
DMCA.com Protection Status

Copyright © 2023 Bệnh viện Thống Nhất. All Rights Reserved