• (028) 38690277 - (028) 39713184
  • lienhe@bvtn.edu.vn
  • T2 - T6: 7:30 - 16:30
Đăng ký
Đăng nhập
Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
Trung tâm đào tạo - Chỉ đạo tuyến
Nghiên cứu khoa học - Hợp tác quốc tế

Quality of life assessment in patients on chronic dialysis: Comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis at a national hospital in Vietnam

Phuong Que Tran1, Nhi Truc Y Nguyen2, Bach Nguyen3, Quynh Thi Huong Bui1, 2
  1. Department of Pharmacy University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
  2. Department of Pharmacy Thong Nhat Hospital Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
  3. Department of Nephrology Thong Nhat Hospital Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
Tải PDF
Đã xuất bản: 7 Tháng 12 2021

Tạp chí: Wiley

ISSN: 1360-2276, 1365-3156

Tập: 27

Số xuất bản: 2
Loại nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu Quốc tế
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13709

Tóm Tắt

AbstractObjectivesEnd‐stage renal disease (ESRD) is a chronic disease that can adversely affect the patient's quality of life (QoL) in terms of functional limitation and cognitive impairment. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with QoL in patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis at a national hospital in Vietnam.MethodsA descriptive cross‐sectional study was conducted among outpatients aged ≥18 years who underwent haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) for at least 3 months at Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam from May 2020 to July 2021. QoL was measured using the validated Vietnamese version of the EuroQol‐5 Dimensional‐5 Level (EQ‐5D‐5L). The factors associated with the QoL of patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis were identified using multiple linear regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 131 (73.6%) and 47 (26.4%) patients underwent HD and PD, respectively. Overall, 178 (55.6%) patients were men (median age, 66 [56–79] years). The mean EQ‐5D‐5L score was significantly higher in patients undergoing PD than in those undergoing HD (0.848 ± 0.183 vs. 0.766 ± 0.231; p = 0.030). Older age (β = −0.006; p < 0.001) and peptic ulcer disease (β = −0.083; p = 0.029) were associated with lower QoL scores. PD treatment was associated with higher QoL scores (β = 0.065; p = 0.046).ConclusionsIt is necessary to improve the QoL of patients undergoing dialysis, especially of elderly patients and patients with peptic ulcer disease. PD may be a better method for maintenance dialysis, if applicable, in terms of QoL.

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Aseel F. Samoudi et al., The impact of pain on the quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis: a multicenter cross-sectional study from Palestine. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2021; 19 :. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01686-zGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Noto et al., Relationship between hemodialysis and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study of diagnosis and duration of hemodialysis. Renal Replacement Therapy. 2020; 7 :1-8. doi: 10.1186/s41100-021-00382-4Google Scholar
  3. T. Hyodo et al., Present status of renal replacement therapy in Asian countries as of 2017: Vietnam, Myanmar, and Cambodia. Renal Replacement Therapy. 2020; 6 :1-14. doi: 10.1186/s41100-020-00312-wGoogle Scholar
  4. Khanh V Doan et al., Associations of Socio-Demographic, Clinical and Biochemical Parameters with Healthcare Cost, Health- and Renal-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients: A Clinical Observational Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17 :. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186552Google Scholar
  5. A. Chuasuwan et al., Comparisons of quality of life between patients underwent peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2020; 18 :. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01449-2Google Scholar
  6. V. Q. Mai et al., An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Vietnam. Quality of Life Research. 2020; 29 :1923 - 1933. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02469-7Google Scholar
  7. Chu-Chun Hsu et al., A comparison of quality of life between patients treated with different dialysis modalities in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15 :. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227297Google Scholar
  8. T. Thaweethamcharoen et al., Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.. Value in health regional issues. 2019; 18 :59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.08.005Google Scholar
  9. N. Surendra et al., Health related quality of life of dialysis patients in Malaysia: Haemodialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. BMC Nephrology. 2019; 20 :. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1326-xGoogle Scholar
  10. Kyle Foreman et al., Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016–40 for 195 countries and territories. Lancet (London, England). 2018; 392 :2052 - 2090. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31694-5Google Scholar
  11. R. Morton et al., FP668SYMPTOM BURDEN AND EUROQOL EQ-5D-5L UTILITY-BASED QUALITY OF LIFE FOR AUSTRALIAN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE RECEIVING RENAL SUPPORTIVE CARE. PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE STATEWIDE COHORT ANALYSIS. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2018; 33 :. doi: 10.1093/NDT/GFY104.FP668Google Scholar
  12. R. Imai et al., Iron Deficiency Anemia Due to the Long-term Use of a Proton Pump Inhibitor. Internal Medicine. 2017; 57 :899 - 901. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9554-17Google Scholar
  13. L. Zazzeroni et al., Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Kidney and Blood Pressure Research. 2017; 42 :717 - 727. doi: 10.1159/000484115Google Scholar
  14. L. Plantinga et al., Early hospital readmission among hemodialysis patients in the United States is associated with subsequent mortality.. Kidney international. 2017; 92 4 :934-941. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.03.025Google Scholar
  15. Bernadette Li et al., Estimating Health-State Utility Values in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Waiting-List Patients Using the EQ-5D-5L. Value in Health. 2017; 20 :976 - 984. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.01.011Google Scholar
  16. C. Kuo et al., Quality of Life for Patients Using Hemodialysis (HD) vs. Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Modalities in Taiwan. Value in Health. 2016; 19 :. doi: 10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.08.497Google Scholar
  17. Yu-Tzu Chang et al., Cost-effectiveness of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A national cohort study with 14 years follow-up and matched for comorbidities and propensity score. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6 :. doi: 10.1038/srep30266Google Scholar
  18. O. Iyasere et al., Quality of Life and Physical Function in Older Patients on Dialysis: A Comparison of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis with Hemodialysis.. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2016; 11 3 :423-30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01050115Google Scholar
  19. A. Atapour et al., A comparison of the quality of life of the patients undergoing hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis and its correlation to the quality of dialysis.. Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia. 2016; 27 2 :270-80. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.178259Google Scholar
  20. P. K. Navva et al., Present Status of Renal Replacement Therapy in Asian Countries. Blood Purification. 2015; 40 :280 - 287. doi: 10.1159/000441574Google Scholar
  21. G. Kang et al., Clinical and psychosocial factors predicting health‐related quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis International. 2015; 19 :. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12271Google Scholar
  22. C. Leung et al., Renal registry in Hong Kong—the first 20 years. Kidney International Supplements. 2015; 5 :33 - 38. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2015.7Google Scholar
  23. L. Laurin et al., Outcomes of Infection-Related Hospitalization according to Dialysis Modality.. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2015; 10 5 :817-24. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09210914Google Scholar
  24. F. Yang et al., Health-related quality of life of Asian patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore. Quality of Life Research. 2015; 24 :2163-2171. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0964-0Google Scholar
  25. K. Parker et al., Medication burden in CKD-5D: impact of dialysis modality and setting. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2014; 7 :557 - 561. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu091Google Scholar
  26. V. Jha et al., Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. The Lancet. 2013; 382 :260-272. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-XGoogle Scholar
  27. S. Parasa et al., End-stage renal disease is associated with worse outcomes in hospitalized patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2013; 77 4 :609-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.014Google Scholar
  28. Khanh Van et al., Examining the health-related quality of life of people with end-stage kidney disease living in Hanoi, Vietnam. . 2012; :. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.014Google Scholar
  29. T. Thaweethamcharoen et al., PUK35 EQ-5D (UK and Thai Preference Weights), SF-6D, and VAS Scores in Dialysis Thai Patients. Value in Health. 2012; 15 :. doi: 10.1016/J.JVAL.2012.03.855Google Scholar
  30. Jiing-Chyuan Luo et al., Incidence of bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2011; 183 :E1345 - E1351. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110299Google Scholar
  31. H. Whitson et al., Correlation Between Symptoms and Function in Older Adults with Comorbidity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009; 57 :. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02178.xGoogle Scholar
  32. H. Noshad et al., Comparison of outcome and quality of life: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients.. Singapore medical journal. 2009; 50 2 :185-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02178.xGoogle Scholar
  33. M. Ginieri-Coccossis et al., Quality of life, mental health and health beliefs in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: Investigating differences in early and later years of current treatment. BMC Nephrology. 2008; 9 :14 - 14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-9-14Google Scholar
  34. Ai-hua Zhang et al., Comparison of quality of life and causes of hospitalization between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007; 5 :49 - 49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-49Google Scholar
  35. P. Roderick et al., An evaluation of the costs, effectiveness and quality of renal replacement therapy provision in renal satellite units in England and Wales.. Health technology assessment. 2005; 9 24 :1-178. doi: 10.3310/HTA9240Google Scholar
  36. J. Wasserfallen et al., Quality of life on chronic dialysis: comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2004; 19 6 :1594-9. doi: 10.1093/NDT/GFH175Google Scholar
  37. D. Mapes et al., Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).. Kidney international. 2003; 64 1 :339-49. doi: 10.1046/J.1523-1755.2003.00072.XGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Jansen et al., Predictors of the rate of decline of residual renal function in incident dialysis patients.. Kidney international. 2002; 62 3 :1046-53. doi: 10.1046/J.1523-1755.2002.00505.XGoogle Scholar
  39. C. Ashley et al., The Renal Drug Handbook. . 1999; :. doi: 10.1046/J.1523-1755.2002.00505.XGoogle Scholar
  40. Obesity in Adults et al., Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults.. Archives of internal medicine. 1998; 158 17 :1855-67. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00276-4Google Scholar
  41. Constitution of the World Health Organization.. American journal of public health and the nation's health. 1946; 36 11 :1315-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.36.11.1315Google Scholar
Tải PDF
Đã xuất bản: 7 Tháng 12 2021
Tạp chí: Tropical Medicine & International Health
Nhà xuất bản: Wiley
ISSN: 1360-2276, 1365-3156
Tập: 27
Số xuất bản: 2
Loại nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu Quốc tế
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13709

Trích dẫn bài viết này

Tran PQ, Nguyen NTY, Nguyen B, Bui QTH. Quality of life assessment in patients on chronic dialysis: Comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis at a national hospital in Vietnam. Tropical medicine & international health. 2021;27:199-206. doi:10.1111/tmi.13709
Logo Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
Trung tâm đào tạo - Chỉ đạo tuyến
Nghiên cứu khoa học - Hợp tác quốc tế
  • ĐC: Số 1, Lý Thường Kiệt, P. 7, Q. Tân Bình, TP. HCM
  • SĐT: (028) 38690277 - (028) 39713184
  • FAX: (028) 39713184
  • Email: lienhe@bvtn.edu.vn
Liên kết nhanh
Giới thiệu
Đào tạo
Tin tức
Chỉ đạo tuyến
Sự kiện
Nghiên cứu khoa học
Liên hệ
Hợp tác quốc tế
Liên kết bên ngoài
Facebook-f Linkedin-in
DMCA.com Protection Status

Copyright © 2023 Bệnh viện Thống Nhất. All Rights Reserved